People have equally strong opinions for or against gay people getting married in church. Those who see homosexuality as something
natural think it's obvious that traditional church weddings are a given, while many religious groups cry out that it is an outright
sacrilege.
For the "grey mass" in between the opposite camps it is difficult to take sides in this, as both sides have arguments that many in
general feel they should honor and respect. Let's go over the basic situation, and then I'd love to hear your opinion on the subject by using the
comment form below.
This is a somewhat controversial subject for an otherwise "easy going" site like this, but I felt like writing something on the subject so
here you go.
Equal legal rights should be a given
To begin with, one can establish the fact that homosexuality is treated very differently in various countries. In some countries it is
considered illegal and those found "guilty" receive harsh punishment. Other countries, like Sweden for example, have come quite a long way and
there the discussion is now about gay couple's rights to adopt children and to get married in church.
Personally I think there really isn't any point to discussing things that have to do with basic human rights. Of course gay people should be
equal members of society, of course they should have all the same legal rights as other couples living together have, and so on.
But should gay people be allowed to be married in church? Here, like many others, I honestly can't answer 100% yes or 100% no.
Who should we respect?
There are many gay people to whom religion, and hence the church, is very important. If they do not feel accepted in their congregation, it
makes them feel harshly rejected and as a result they are miserable on a very fundamental level.
For this reason it is perfectly understandable that gay people feel church should be just as obvious a choice as it is for straight people
getting married.
On the other hand, in most western countries we have large religious groups who consider getting married in front of God an institution that
by its very definition can be granted only to a man and a woman. It is an integral part of the map/model these people have of the world, and they
feel offended when someone talks about bending the rules. Moreover they often feel unjustly accused, when more moderate Christians think they are
overly conservative.
Like I said earlier, I haven't been able to make up my mind on this point. On the one hand, I think it is really narrow minded to
literally hold on to every word that is mentioned in the bible - that furthermore often can be interpreted in many different ways. Why would
good Christians have to feel offended by gay weddings, when it really is none of their business? They don't loose any of their own rights
just because gay people get married in Church.
On the other hand, I am sometimes inclined to think that some of the more outspoken gay organizations in western society have outdone
themselves in their quest for equal acceptance. It sometimes almost turns into kind of a "it's hip to be gay so we really think you should be gay
too" attitude.
This can easily get on people's nerves, and for that reason I think some have come to consider church somewhat of the last bastion that
haven't been "conquered" by the gay way of life. And is it really an absolute must to get accepted in in an organization that doesn't accept who
you are?
So what are we to do? Isn't there a solution that everybody could be happy with and accept?
Even as lawmakers across the nation debate legislation banning same-sex marriage, couples are uniting in weddings both miniature and massive, fueling a growing industry peddling ...
More than two dozen gay Arab men — arrested at what police called a mass homosexual wedding — could face government-ordered hormone treatments, five years in jail and a lashing ...
"Get out your gay/lesbian rice and celebrate! Taking you from the wedding announcement to the thank you notes, this is the ultimate guide to same-sex ceremonies." -Michael Musto, Village Voice